tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-81491495445470898982024-03-13T20:45:03.895+08:00ATC PenangPenang ATChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05577049246438576061noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-9803888432870943612013-01-17T10:09:00.002+08:002013-01-17T10:17:31.822+08:00 Exam Technique<br />
<br />
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-divuJ0A-e30/UPdegnL24-I/AAAAAAAAARQ/XuRRXr_BMxo/s1600/Exam.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-divuJ0A-e30/UPdegnL24-I/AAAAAAAAARQ/XuRRXr_BMxo/s320/Exam.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<br />
<div class="Section0">
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"> </span><span style="font-size: 11.5pt; font-weight: bold;">Exam Technique</span><span style="font-size: 11.5pt; font-weight: bold;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Since the examination is almost upon us, it might be useful to say a little about examination technique. Many external (and internal) students, though they clearly know the law, do not do as well as they should because of poor exam technique. </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">The Golden Rule </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">There is one golden rule in doing law exams: answer the question. This might seem obvious, but at least 90% of students answer the question they wish had been asked, not the one which was. You cannot expect to get credit for an answer which does not address the question, no matter how accurate the information you give may be. If in a history exam, you were asked to give a list of the kings of England but instead gave one of the kinds of Israel, then no matter that your list was perfect in every way, you would receive a mark of zero, for you have not answered the question asked. Law examinations are no different. </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">It should be remembered that much work goes into preparing your examination papers. The Chief Examiner will spend many hours setting the papers, which are then checked by the Deputy Chief Examiner, whose comments are relayed back to the Chief Examiner. He or she will then rewrite the papers in light of those comments. Those amended papers are then referred to a scrutiny committee of the External Laws Programme, where at least ten pairs of eyes review the amended papers. Their comments are in turn relayed to the Chief Examiner, who will amend again the papers accordingly. It is therefore a great disappointment to find students ignoring the carefully crafted questions and answering their own. It should, however, be no surprise to those students when they subsequently fail. </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">An increasing problem of late is the use by candidates of pre-prepared answers, written no doubt by third-rate lecturers in third-rate institutions. Students should NOT use these. First, they are generally of an inferior standard, far below that expected of a degree from the University of London. Second, they will inevitably not be an answer to the question, for the third-rate lecturer will not have the gift of foresight, and so will not know the question which will appear on the exam. It should not be forgotten that examiners mark hundreds and hundreds of scripts. It is therefore fairly easy for them to see when pre-prepared answers are being used. </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">So, how do you ensure that you ‘answer the question’? Let us first discuss essay questions, and then problem questions. </span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 8.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">External Undergraduate Laws Programme, University of London </span><span style="font-size: 8.0000pt; font-weight: bold; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">Page 1 of 3 </span><span style="font-size: 8.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; page-break-before: always;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">Essays </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">The ‘trick’ here is to deconstruct the question asked. Take the question to bits, and play it back to the examiner, explaining the issues which the question raises. Take, for example, the following question from a few years ago: </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 36pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">Any system of law which recognised the trust would have need of the automatic resulting trust, for this merely provides the mechanism by which property ineffectively given on trust beneficially remains with the would-be donor. On the other hand, there is no similar need for the presumed resulting trust, which is anachronistic and has largely outlived its usefulness. </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">Discuss. </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">The first thing to notice is that the examiner has not said, ‘Please write everything you know about resulting trusts’. Yet, the vast majority of candidates will answer the question as if he did. What the examiner has instead done is ask a specific question, and the first thing to do is identify exactly what that is. And that is done by simply playing back the question in different language. So here, we could say that the question raises a number of issues. First, it assumes that there are two types of resulting trust, the presumed and automatic. One issue is whether such a distinction is valid. Second, on the assumption that there really are resulting trusts which are ‘automatic’ (and the meaning of that word will need to be explained), the next question is whether such trusts are needed. Is there no other way of dealing with the situations to which they are a response? Third, is it correct to say that such trusts arise because the property ‘beneficially remains with the would-be donor’? And fourth, what is the true based of presumed resulting trusts? What is the presumption in play in such cases? And can it really be said to be anachronistic? </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">Notice that in deconstructing the question, you have provided yourself with a structure for your answer. Moreover, you have ensured that everything you then say will be of relevance to the question asked. After that, you can’t go wrong! </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11.0000pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">Problem questions </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">These again are not an invitation for candidates to write all they know about a particular subject. So, the first three pages of your answer should NOT consist of a potted summary of the law on, for example, secret trusts. The examiner will simply get out a red pen and score through this part of your answer. What you should instead do is identify the broad area of the question (‘This is a question on secret trusts’) and then the specific issues it raises (‘There is a problem as to the timing of the communication of the terms of the half-secret trust’; ‘there is a problem as to the lack of written evidence concerning the alleged declaration of trust respecting Blackacre’; ‘there is a problem in that the communication was made to only one of two trustees’; etc, etc’). Not only have you now got a structure for your answer, but you also have a check-list to which you can refer to ensure that you’ve not omitted anything important from your answer. There’s nothing worse than coming out of the exam room and saying to yourself, ‘Oh, I forgot to mention the communication point’. Detailing the issues at the start helps prevent this. Moreover, it demonstrates to the examiner that you are someone who knows what they’re talking about. </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 8.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">External Undergraduate Laws Programme, University of London </span><span style="font-size: 8.0000pt; font-weight: bold; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">Page 2 of 3 </span><span style="font-size: 8.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; page-break-before: always;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">General matters </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">There are a number of general matters you should consider. The first, and most important, is that you give equal weight to all your answers. In the Trusts exam, you have to write four answers, and you should spend equal amounts of time on each. There is no point spending two hours producing a first-class answer to one question if you then have to rush the other three, and score thirds in each. One thing to remember is that it is far easier to score marks at the lower end of the spectrum than at the top, and your aim should, it goes without saying, be to score as many points as you can. </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">Second, make sure you do four questions: the examiners cannot give you marks for a blank page. Even if you only identify what the question is about and say something basic about the topic, though you might not pass, you will get some marks, and those marks might make the difference between a pass and a fail. </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">Third, read the paper through completely before you begin to write. For the first time ever, this year you will be given 15 minutes reading time. Use that time wisely. Read through the paper as a whole, identifying what each question is about. Then go back and read it again to make sure you got this right. Then choose the four questions you propose to do and read them through for a third time to make sure you can do them. And finally, try to identify the issues each question raises, so that, when you begin to write your answer, you can start with a confident recitation of them. </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">Fourth, and finally, leave some time so that you can READ THROUGH YOUR ANSWERS AT THE END. This is probably the most important thing you can do. It is very easy in the stress of the examination to write one thing but think another. Particularly problematic are small words such as ‘not’. Your brain is racing ahead of your hand, and it is very easy to leave these words out, in the process completely altering the meaning of what you wanted to say. You can probably gain around four or five percentage points just by going through your paper at the end, correcting errors, and ensuring good expression. And those four or five percentage points may make the difference between classes or even pass/fail. </span><span style="font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';">And now all that remains is for me to wish you the best of luck in June.</span><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'; font-size: 11.0000pt; mso-spacerun: 'yes';"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
</div>
</div>
Penang ATChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05577049246438576061noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-53152606517845987832012-12-12T10:15:00.002+08:002012-12-13T10:17:09.753+08:00The Story of Christmas<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ED9QnEDISuM/UMk6Woo79MI/AAAAAAAAAQ0/EqxikeCddKA/s1600/Christmas%2BTalk.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ED9QnEDISuM/UMk6Woo79MI/AAAAAAAAAQ0/EqxikeCddKA/s640/Christmas%2BTalk.JPG" width="458" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The Story of Christmas
Understanding the Advent of the Christ through Scriptures
On a fine Sunday afternoon, a talk was given. To be exact, on 2 December 2012 from 230pm to 830pm. It was hosted by the ATC Penang Christian Fellowship, students from both A-Levels and LL. B courses, who profess the Christian faith listened intently to Andrew Khoo.
It was a story told time and time again for the past two thousand years. But unlike many stories, this story is not fiction. It was real, it really happened. This is not a story, but the story. A story that split the recording of time into two; BC and AD. It is the story of Christmas, the birth of Christ the Lord. The God-Man whose hands formed the stars, was born as a human child to save mankind from his sins.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> The talk encompassed a variety of themes unified under the focal point of the advent of Jesus Christ. We embarked on a journey throughout Scriptures, from the Old Testament to the New, and from the New back to the Old; there and back again. We were brought back into time, back into the ancient past. We began with the Annunciation to Zechariah at the temple in Jerusalem, beamed then into an obscure room where we witness the Annunciation to Mary in Nazareth. We climbed the hill country of Judea in where Mary visited Elizabeth, then we are transported to Bethlehem, beside ox and cattle in a cave and underneath a bright star, where the Child King was born. With each step taken, we deepen our understanding on the coming of Jesus Christ and his role in the history of mankind.
The world truly is a stage, we are all actors in it and God is the Divine Director, orchestrating all the events of history. Indeed, history is His-story. What a comfort indeed, to know that all is in His hands. Here's a snippet of what had happened:
'Angels and annunciations, prophets and prophecies.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> A Child long foretold and destined to be the one to bring balance to the Force (OK Maybe not that). The hopes and fears of all the years come together one quiet nigh two thousand years ago in the little town of Bethlehem. With a cast of thousands from the emperor of Rome himself to the prophets of Israel, priests, shepherds and animals of various kinds, and amazing props such as the ark of the covenant and with the temple of Herod in Jerusalem as the backdrop. This tale of God's fidelity unfolds. Come and discover what Child is this and the amazing story of God's love in the Birth of Jesus Christ.' - Andrew Khoo
Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to the many who made this possible. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Andrew Khoo for his effort in preparing for a most interesting and surreal talk, Amy Cheah as the Chief Organiser (special note on her persistence and insistence on having the talk), David John Au for leading the praise and worship, all those who had helped out in some way or another, and not to forget the students who have attended the talk as well. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Mark Tan
Lecturer
Teacher-Advisor of the ATC Penang Christian Fellowship</span>Penang ATChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05577049246438576061noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-90344003367138428542012-10-23T10:40:00.001+08:002012-10-23T10:42:10.641+08:00Daniel Chua, The Best Speaker in LAWASIA International Moot Competition<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Congratulations Daniel!! We are very proud of you!!!</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-8nOq0S7yVo8/UIYDc6ifm5I/AAAAAAAAAMc/UM7cnmZKKDY/s1600/480699_10151431587719115_70058863_n.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="266" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-8nOq0S7yVo8/UIYDc6ifm5I/AAAAAAAAAMc/UM7cnmZKKDY/s400/480699_10151431587719115_70058863_n.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
Penang ATChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05577049246438576061noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-26804759271830381032012-08-24T11:50:00.001+08:002012-08-24T11:57:11.893+08:00ATC 2012 Induction<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WXAk9ObBNow/UDb4S1fu3ZI/AAAAAAAAAL4/ixW8REu1ETk/s1600/induction+sept+2012.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WXAk9ObBNow/UDb4S1fu3ZI/AAAAAAAAAL4/ixW8REu1ETk/s640/induction+sept+2012.bmp" width="580" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />Penang ATChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05577049246438576061noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-38988671971656230702012-07-12T15:11:00.002+08:002013-01-17T10:04:40.018+08:00LAMA V BARU<div class="MsoTitle" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Saya mendapat tahu mengenai perobohan Penjara Pudu apabila melihat rancangan video di internet baru-baru ini. Cadangan untuk menulis artikel ini membuat saya terpanggil untuk mendalami sedikit sebanyak rahsia penjara berusia lebih 100 tahun ini. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Mula dibina pada 1891, penjara yang menyerupai bentuk Penjara Kandy di Bogambia ini siap sepenuhnya pada 1895 dengan menggunakan batu bata yang dilepa dengan simen yang diimport dari negara jajahan British ketika itu. Menelan belanja sebanyak RM 15,360.90 (harga pada 1800-an), tidak hairanlah bahagian dalam penjara ini sejuk jika dibandingkan dengan keadaan cuaca di luar. Campuran bahan seperti granit (ada yang memanggilnya batu gua kerana dapat ditemui di gua) dan reka bentuknya ( kebanyakan bangunan kolonial British mempunyai 2 lapisan dinding) merupakan faktor penyumbang kepada keadaan ini. Ini sekaligus membataskan pergerakan para banduan yang terpaksa menghabiskan tempoh hukuman mereka di dalam sel penjara yang cukup menyeksakan. Tembok Penjara Pudu telah dibina pada Februari 1891 dan siap dibina pada Ogos 1892. Sebanyak 2000 liter cat digunakan oleh para banduan untuk melukis mural telah mencipta rekod dunia dengan 384 meter panjang dan 4.5 meter tinggi. Kini Penjara Pudu hanya tinggal sebagai kenangan sejarah. Patutkah Malaysia mengorbankan sejarah demi mengejar pembangunan? Inilah persoalan yang ditimbulkan oleh Profesor Emeritus Dr. Khoo Kay Khim. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span lang="EN-GB">Timbalan Menteri Kewangan , Datuk Dr.Awang Adek Hussin berkata di Dewan Rakyat bahawa, Penjara Pudu bukanlah sesuatu yang boleh dibanggakan oleh Malaysia. Kerajaan telah memutuskan bahawa Penjara Pudu bukan tapak warisan dan tidak harus dijadikan tapak warisan. Ya, saya akui. Tempat yang digunakan untuk “menyimpan” penjenayah bukanlah sesuatu yang boleh dibanggakan. Namun, senibina penjara tersebut yang berusia 118 tahun bukanlah sesuatu yang dapat dicari pada masa kini. Mungkin teknologinya tidak secanggih Menara Berkembar Petronas namun, nilai estetika yang dimilikinya tidak mungkin bertukar ganti. Terletak di radius segitiga emas di ibu negara, Penjara Pudu terpaksa akur kepada pelebaran jalanraya dan juga pembangunan yang dikatakan telah dapat menarik perhatian pelancong serta pelabur. Mengingat kembali petikan kata-kata bijak pandai, </span><span class="apple-style-span"><span lang="EN-GB">“Bangsa yang tidak menghargai sejarah sendiri, ia tidak akan menjadi bangsa yang berjaya”.</span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Penjara ini pernah menempatkan seramai 6550 orang banduan yang menyebabkan kesesakan sehingga memaksa banduan mengambil giliran untuk tidur. Akhirnya pada 1 November 1996, jam 9.05 pagi, Penjara Pudu dengan rasminya ditutup apabila kesemua penghuninya berpindah ke Penjara Sungai Buluh yang dapat menampung jumlah banduan yang lebih ramai. Sejak itu, Penjara Pudu terbiar kosong. Ia pernah dibuka seketika dan belanja sebanyak RM 1.7 juta digunakan untuk ubah-suai penjara tersebut untuk menjadikannya tarikan pelancong. Malangnya, usaha tersebut hanya hangat-hangat tahi ayam. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Secara jujur, saya agak terkilan dengan jawapan menteri terbabit di Dewan Rakyat . Jika dilihat seperti di negara tuan rumah Piala Dunia 2010, Afrika Selatan, mereka masih mengekalkan penjara di Pulau Robben yang pernah menempatkan Nelson Mandela ketika beliau menentang dasar Apartheid di sana. Filipina juga masih membuka lawatan kepada pelancong untuk melihat penjara yang pernah digunakan untuk memenjarakan tokoh besar negara itu, Jose Rizal. Baiklah, mungkin hakikat ini boleh diterima sekiranya dikatakan penjara-penjara ini menempatkan tokoh-tokoh yang berjuang demi tanah air mereka. Bagaimana pula dengan Penjara Alcatraz? Drama bersiri “Prison Break” lakonan Dominic Purcell dan Wentworth Miller adalah adaptasi daripada kisah sebenar pembolosan banduan daripada Penjara Alcatraz pada tahun 1962. Penjara ini kini dibuka kepada pelawat. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Ini menunjukkan bahawa, walaupun tidak semuanya mengenai penjara adalah sesuatu yang baik, namun masih terdapat nilai yang dapat digunakan untuk peringatan kepada generasi akan datang. Antara penjenayah terkenal yang pernah mendiami Penjara Pudu ialah Wong Swee Chin atau lebih dikenali sebagai Botak Chin. Mendapat jolokan Robin Hood Malaysia, dia ialah penjenayah yang paling berbahaya pada ketika itu dan akhirnya menjalani hukuman gantung pada 11 Jun 1981. Blok D Penjara Pudu yang menempatkan bilik terakhir dan juga bilik gantung telah menyaksikan seramai 180 orang yang menjalani hukuman di antara tahun 1960 hingga 1993. Bagi mereka yang mempunyai pengalaman di sini (banduan, warden penjara dan polis) pasti merasa kesal apabila kenangan mereka diragut dengan perobohan ini. Seorang warden penjara pernah menceritakan bahawa para banduan di blok D akan menyanyi sepanjang malam apabila rakan mereka bakal menjalani hukuman gantung pada keesokan paginya. Walaupun mereka merupakan penjenayah , orang yang pernah melanggar undang-undang, ternyata mereka masih mempunyai perasaan kemanusiaan.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Penjara Pudu juga menjadi saksi kepada penahanan dua orang awam pada 1985 iaitu Dr. Radzi Jaafar dan Dr.Abdul Aziz Abdul Majid di bilik rawatan penjara tersebut oleh 6 orang banduan yang diketuai oleh Jimmy Chuah. Penahanan ini berakhir 6 hari kemudian selepas banduan menyerah diri. </span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Tragedi yang menarik perhatian dari dalam dan luar negara ini seharusnya dijadikan iktibar. <span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Presiden Persatuan Ekonomi Pengguna dan Keluarga Malaysia, Prof Dr. Jariah Masud memberitahu, tiada siapa yang boleh menyangkal Penjara Pudu mempunyai nilai sejarah, tetapi tiada siapa boleh menolak pembangunan. Pembangunan di kawasan itu dikatakan lebih positif berbanding dengan pemeliharaan Penjara Pudu sebagai tempat penyimpanan banduan. Saya tidak bersetuju dengan kenyataan ini. Seperti yang pernah diwar-warkan suatu ketika dahulu, rakyat Malaysia perlu mengubah minda untuk menjadi bangsa kelas pertama. Bagaimana? Adakah dengan pemodenan dan pembangunan, taraf pemikiran sesuatu bangsa dapat dipertingkatkan? </span></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Melihatkan keadaan di Malaysia sekarang, kadar jenayah semakin membimbangkan. Kebanyakannya melibatkan golongan remaja. Pernah dengar mencegah lebih baik daripada mengubati? Undang-undang dan penjara tidak dapat dipisahkan. Tidak salah jika saya cadangkan jika Penjara Pudu ini digunakan sebagai medium untuk pemulihan dan menyedarkan mereka yang masih baru melibatkan diri dengan jenayah. Konsep “rehab” boleh digunakan dengan menempatkan atau mungkin membawa mereka melihat betapa sukarnya kehidupan di dalam penjara. Nukilan-nukilan banduan dapat dilihat di dinding-dinding sel, dan ini sedikit sebanyak dapat membantu anak-anak muda kita sedar sebelum terlewat. </span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Bangunan lama ini bakal digantikan dengan pembangunan yang menggunakan teknologi canggih. Persoalannya , adakah pelabur sanggup melaburkan wang di atas tempat yang pernah menjadi tapak untuk menggantung banduan? Adakah logik jika dibangkitkan isu “mistik” pada zaman moden yang serba canggih? Ketika manusia sudah dapat menjejaki kaki di bulan, ketika kita dapat berhubung dengan benua bersebelahan tanpa menggunakan burung merpati, adakah isu “hantu” ini relevan? Jujur saya akui, saya masih mempercayai mengenai kewujudan entiti ini. Ada warden yang pernah mendengar suara-suara tangisan dan meminta tolong di bilik terakhir ketika proses pengosongan penjara ini. Mungkin ianya kedengaran karut, tetapi itulah pengalaman mereka. Sedangkan ahli parlimen kita sendiri, </span><strong>Datuk Mohamad Aziz</strong><span class="apple-converted-space"><b> </b></span><span class="apple-style-span"><b>(</b></span><strong>BN-Sri Gading</strong><span class="apple-style-span"><b>)</b></span><span class="apple-converted-space"><b><span style="color: #31365f; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt;"> </span></b></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">ketika bersidang di Dewan Rakyat berkata, “</span><span class="apple-style-span">Penjara Pudu itu banyak hantu! Siapa yang hendak beli? Beribu-ribu hantu berkeliaran kerana ramai banduan digantung di situ sejak lebih 100 tahun dahulu.</span> <span class="apple-style-span">Hantu memang ada dan bila mereka melihat ia dirobohkan, sudah pasti akan menyimpan dendam terhadap semua yang terlibat dalam perobohannya. Bodohlah siapa yang akan belinya nanti, sanggupkah berjiran dan duduk bersama dengan hantu!" </span></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Ini mungkin, sekadar khabar angin. Sejauh mana kebenarannya masih belum kita ketahui. Sekiranya ia betul , maka negara kita bakal mengalami kerugian berbillion ringgit.</span></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Namun kini, semuanya telah terlambat. Tanggal jam 10.20 malam pada 21 Jun 2010, Penjara Pudu sedikit demi sedikit menyembah bumi. Yang tinggal hanyalah nama. Namun, kita masih mungkin menarik lafas lega apabila pihak yang terbabit bersetuju untuk mengekalkan pintu gerbang serta 2 lukisan mural yang terletak di bahagian kiri dan kanan pintu utama. Sekurang-kurangnya, masih terdapat sedikit sisa untuk tatapan generasi akan datang dan mungkin juga untuk mereka yang belum berkesempatan mengunjungi Penjara Pudu seperti saya. Walaupun projek Bukit Bintang City Centre </span></div>
<div style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin: 0in; text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">( BBCC ) yang akan menelan belanja lebih kurang RM 5 billion ini bakal menggantikan Penjara Pudu , hakikatnya Penjara Pudu tidak akan hilang begitu saja……..</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">~Cik Musleeha Muhamad ~</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Intermediate Jan 2010</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Penang ATChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05577049246438576061noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-62710661354025338612012-07-12T15:05:00.001+08:002012-07-19T11:41:27.842+08:00Speaker’s Square, Penang<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">On Sunday, June 27, 2010, Public Law Lecturer Mr. Mark Cephas Tan took his class of Intermediate students to the Speaker's Square inPenang. It is truly unique in the sense that it is the one and only in this country.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Speaker's Square seems rather out of place here in Malaysia. It sounds more like a fancy foreign thing. We are indeed lucky and indebted to the Penang State Government for this privilege.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It was drizzling slightly and grey clouds hung ominously. Still, upon arriving there, there was a sizeable crowd. I spotted my<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>friend among his Gerakan comrades. They spotted us too, and before long, we engaged in a conversation. The awkwardness with the new place quickly disappeared. More and more people came and gathered. The Gerakan group seemed poised to talk. Mr. <span class="apple-style-span">Sanjay Kumar Kanchanlal, Senior Public Law Lecturer, joined us halfway with his wife.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">With half the crowd folding their arms, the first speaker, from the Gerakan group took his place and started speaking. Catering to the majority of the crowd, he spoke in Mandarin about issues beleaguering the island and directed his jabs at its Chief Minister. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Though the drizzle showed no signs of stopping, the crowd increased steadily. I noticed a small group, distinct from the crowd, armed with notebooks, pens and some with cameras. As the speaker spoke on, they were jotting down notes and snapping shots. Immediately after the speaker was done, they surrounded him and posed questions, chimed in by snapshots of large cameras. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The chain of speakers continued with the second speaker taking the centre stage, also from the Gerakan group. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">It was not long until a few senior citizens started to get rowdy and jeered at the Gerakan speaker. One passion driven uncle took the front page of a Chinese daily and pointed to the words out loudly. Together with his gang, they were rather affluent with Hokkien vulgarity. Later on, I learnt that they were Rocket supporters, and the issue at hand was politicised. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I had fun and some real insight. Regardless of our political affiliations, school of thoughts, I think (in general) Malaysians are not up to that kind of standard of maturity just yet. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Most people just want to talk, or they want to hear want they want to hear. No one is listening properly, and almost certainly, no one has bothered to research an issue<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>thoroughly<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>enough.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Though I believe the establishment of such a place is 'coming of age' for Malaysians. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There were also claims saying that the place is merely a political agenda of politicians. Despite its triteness, people still do not seem to grasp the saying that politicians are politicians, and the ultimate goal of any politicians is to gain power. I doubt the existence of a 'kind and fatherly politician’. They will have their own agendas, because that's what they do. However, we as the people could control and subject them to responsibility and accountability, through our identity as voters. So, to me, *even* if the Speaker's Square is part of any political agenda, there is nothing wrong with it. The people want it, the people like it. Politicians usually do what the people want and like to gain support. So we end up with a place where we can talk freely and exchange ideas and speak in the public because politicians built it, in their quest for power. Is it a bad thing? I doubt so. The voters are only fulfilling their function, and their function is to make them politicians *work* for power.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I'm already thinking of going for the second time.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">~ Daniel Teoh ~</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Intermediate Jan 2010</span></div>Penang ATChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05577049246438576061noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-38108201055162600622012-07-12T15:01:00.002+08:002012-07-17T11:31:03.865+08:005th LAWASIA International Moot Competition<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LrVotGIOSFU/T_51p001wrI/AAAAAAAAADs/wBn83yqgHG4/s1600/moot.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="296" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LrVotGIOSFU/T_51p001wrI/AAAAAAAAADs/wBn83yqgHG4/s320/moot.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">LawAsia Moots The Law Asia Moot may be imagined to be a fun and beneficial event to a minority of law students and a nightmare to the rest. Having been a participant myself, I'd take a mid-point stand to say that it was indeed fun and beneficial but the workload is a nightmare without a doubt. In class, we are faced with an approximate 10-line question of facts. In the Lawasia Moot, you would face an approximate 10 page question of facts in a field of law so random you might not even be in relation to.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> However, if you can and want to withstand that pressure put upon you to overcome all obstacles thrown upon you to get to that judgmental Moot Court, I assure you that it will be a magnificent feeling when you are able to present your ideas, your arguments and your confidence to the judges who consist of big shot Lawyers, High Court Judges, Court of Appeal Judges, Federal Court Judges and even the Lord Chief Justice himself. You will feel like a lawyer. You will appreciate the mechanics of law and most significantly, you will be able to apply your new found argumentative knowledge to your present syllabus of study to create an explosion within your personal boundaries with regards to the field of law. ~ Daniel Chuah~ Intermediate 2010 </span></div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gyglKy4hDCg/T_51qIlNeDI/AAAAAAAAAD4/e0zsTLX9aZ4/s1600/moot1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="296" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gyglKy4hDCg/T_51qIlNeDI/AAAAAAAAAD4/e0zsTLX9aZ4/s320/moot1.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Ms. Irene Kam (ATC KL, extreme left), Kuhen Gopal (second from left) & Daniel Chua (third from left) Daniel Chuah, Kuhen Gopal and Saravanesh Supramaniam did well to reach the Semi-finals. They had no formal training and emerged champions in their own right . ~The Gavel </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-l_lyieMXrnQ/T_51rPEmiUI/AAAAAAAAAEE/xd292fULAAM/s1600/moot2.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="298" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-l_lyieMXrnQ/T_51rPEmiUI/AAAAAAAAAEE/xd292fULAAM/s320/moot2.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Saravanesh S (third from left) & Daniel Chua second from right) at the Law Asia Moot.</span>Penang ATChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05577049246438576061noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-90879230463497039662012-06-21T17:43:00.002+08:002012-07-17T11:21:52.786+08:00Democracy's Christian Roots<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">‘just as our language and culture is steeped in the Bible, so too is our politics. From human rights and equality to our constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy…’ – David Cameron</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Ain't this an intellectual blow upon the face of atheistic secularism? Prime Minister David Cameron in his King James Bible speech showed an understanding that the democratic project began way before the Enlightenment, it is rooted in biblical religion, in Jerusalem.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Equality – due to the fact that God made us, that we are all made in the image of God.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy – due to the fact that since we are equal, one should not be made an unwilling subject of another.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Fundamental human rights – are inalienable due to the ontological view of man that biblical religion has proposed. Christianity offers a dignitarian view of man. That man has rights not because legislatures say so, but that it is God-given, by man's nature as children of God.</span></div>Mark MH Tanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874792481673969858noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-31349360047174434502012-06-21T17:41:00.003+08:002012-07-17T11:05:28.066+08:00Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Law is a distinct form of political order. But order is not for order's sake. Order is a means to an end. Nobody, except those with OCD, would desire order as an end. But 'order for order's sake' is what is argued by legal positivists. H. L. A. Hart, J. Raz, H. Kelsen and those of the tradition of analytical jurisprudence claim that law is nothing but a social instrument to regulate human behaviour. The question that is left unanswered here would be 'why should we regulate human behaviour?' I hereby postulate that legal positivism provides a deficient, if not dangerous, view on the nature of law.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">It is deficient in the sense that it fails to see law as moral enterprise. Positivism has been highly effective in discerning the function of the law, but not its purpose. The purpose of a particular instrument cannot be detached from its function. It would be silly, for example, to understand the functions of a car, how the pistons and brake system works and forget about the purpose of the car; which is to be able to ferry people around to places. Similarly, the order that the law provides for society, is for a certain </span><i style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">telos</i><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;"> or purpose; towards what Aristotle calls as human flourishing.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Law cannot be detached from the goal of human flourishing, all its norms and regulations should be directed towards this goal. If a law departs from this goal (eg. permitting the mass murder of its citizens), then that particular law has departed from what John Finnis refers to as the focal or central meaning of the term law. An unjust law is not law in the truest sense of the word.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">One may argue that such a view of law would only be tenable if the criteria for human flourishing is objective. And since moral relativism is slowly taken root in society both in a</span><i style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;"> de jure</i><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;"> and </span><i style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">de facto</i><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;"> sense. The view of law as a moral enterprise would not be a practical option.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Let us consider this further. If we reject the notion that there are moral truths, then this rejection does not correspond with empirical data. If moral values are nothing but social preferences, then we would not argue about it. For example, we would not argue with one who insists that vanilla ice cream is better that chocolate, the reason being that it is a matter of preference. But we would argue about a particular action (eg abortion, euthanasia) as unjust or immoral. Such an argument would only make sense if there is an objective standard to appeal to. Such an appeal to external moral demands would refute the notion of moral relativism which interpret moral values as preferences rather than objective standards.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">The argument above may indicate that there is an objective standard of morality, but this would not solve the issue that there is much controversy over what is the content of this objective standard. I would have to concede that there is difficulty over ascertaining moral truths purely through reason. This perhaps is due to the fact that man's reason is confined to certain boundaries, to his mental faculties and observational senses. However, this does not mean that one should abandon the search of objective moral standards.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Controversy should not deter us from seeking the truth, in fact, such controversies should serve as a form of motivation instead; that one should desire more to transcend moral uncertainty. I see no such desire in legal positivism, I see only intellectual laziness, a refusal to pursue the truth to the end.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Legal positivism cannot depart from the idea that it is force or coercion that legitimizes the law. Legal positivism may try to justify that the systemic validity of laws lie not in coercion but in, for example, a social norm or custom; it cannot depart too far from the notion of might is right, or might is law, for there is no conceptual link between law and morality. Since there is no such conceptual link, this would substantially weaken the ability of one to appeal to standards of morality against an unjust government. This would also absolutize the state, in the sense that its legal norms ought to be obeyed regardless of whether or not it has failed to abide to the standards of justice. This indeed is self-evidently dangerous.</span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br style="color: #666666; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, FreeMono, monospace; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Only when we view the law as a moral enterprise would we be driven to ascertain first, objective moral principles, and then, its practical implications. Only by cultivating such a view through the education of future politicians, judicial officials and lawyers would the state understand that its role is limited, and is always at the service of human flourishing.</span></div>Mark MH Tanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874792481673969858noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-38979057720157961172012-06-21T17:41:00.000+08:002012-07-17T11:04:58.676+08:00Ignorance and Abortion<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">From the vantage point of a Catholic, life begins at conception. Life, in this sense, would mean ‘personhood’. If one is a human person, then it would be morally wrong to kill him.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">But even if one would not accept the proposition that life begins at conception, one must at least be humble enough to accept that there is no conclusive evidence as to when life begins. If this is the case, abortion would still be morally wrong.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">This is due to the following proposition: that if one is unsure as to when ‘life’ begins, it would be morally irresponsible for one to engage in an abortion. If we are unsure as to whether ‘personhood’ is conferred upon an embryo, for example, then there is a possibility of the embryo being a person.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">If there is a possibility of the embryo being a person, then it would be, by analogy, like shooting a moving bush (unsure of what’s behind it) hoping that it be a deer rather than a human being. In such a circumstance, if the ‘thing’ behind the bush turns out to be a human, there is gross negligence on the part of the shooter.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">In a similar way, going for an abortion, not knowing whether the embryo is a person or not shows moral irresponsibility and may constituted as gross negligence.</span></div>Mark MH Tanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874792481673969858noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8149149544547089898.post-26289555381732261472012-05-18T11:37:00.000+08:002012-07-17T11:04:34.190+08:00The Tyranny of the Majority<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">'Why do we follow the majority? It is because they have more reason? No, because they have more power.' - Blaise Pascal, </span><i style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Pensees</i></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">It has often been said,'the majority wins'. But why must the minority yield to the majority? Upon what basis should this be done? If the majority is of the opinion that good is evil and evil is good, would it be so? If the majority is convinced that cannibalism is perfectly moral, would it be morally acceptable to eat you?</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">The purpose of this short article would be to put forth the argument that there is no rational basis to obey the majority. It is not based on reason that we abide to the view of the majority. If this is so, then why is the majority view so often accepted? I believe that there are two reasons behind this.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Firstly, it is due the fact that we fear. We fear what is stronger than us. And the majority is stronger than the minority. The 'general will', a term I borrow from J. Rousseau, is homogeneous, and is not a representative of all. But since it exercise dominance over the minority, the minority would express acquiescence to the majority. In a sense, the minority is actually coerced to agree with the majority.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">Secondly, and more importantly, it is due to the fact that we are creatures of our environment. We are shaped by our environment. We also generally assume that our environment is natural. And since the majority has power, it would be their views that shapes society. It would be the view of the majority which would be made to seem 'natural'. Thus, we accept the majority will merely because it is customary to do so. We do not question it for it seems so 'natural' to us.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;">As a conclusion, I would appeal to all to be critical of accepted traditions, majority views, etc. For only when we do so would there be a progress of the mind.</span></div>Mark MH Tanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00874792481673969858noreply@blogger.com0